LOS ANGELES  — The future of the troubled San Onofre nuclear power  plant could balance on an inescapable question: Is it worth the money to  fix it?
 Engineers face a daunting task finding a solution for problems that  knocked the seaside plant offline last winter. And even if they come up  with a plan that fully addresses safety and operational issues, will it  all make sense on a balance sheet?
 The twin reactor plant between San Diego and Los Angeles has long  been a source of lower-cost power, but its complex and costly mechanical  troubles have raised questions that might have seemed unrealistic just  months ago.
 “Shutting down the plant, at the end of the day, might not be the  worst-case scenario for shareholders or customers,” says Travis Miller,  director of utilities research at equities analyst Morningstar Inc.
 Two decades ago, San Onofre’s Unit 1 reactor was shut down and then  dismantled when owners faced the prospect of swallowing a $125 million  bill for upgrades and repairs. Oregon’s Trojan nuclear plant closed its  doors in 1993, rather than replace steam generators that had leaky  tubes.
 Now, similar issues will be on the table for San Onofre’s two  remaining reactors, shuttered as engineers try to figure out how to stop  unprecedented decay in generator tubes that carry radioactive water.  The plant hasn’t produced electricity since Jan. 31.
 The plant normally generates enough power for 1.4 million homes. With  summer here and no restart date in sight, state officials are  encouraging conservation to ensure the lights stay on in Southern  California when temperatures and electricity use peak.
READ MORE... 

No comments:
Post a Comment
This is an unmoderated blog. Please be professional and respectful as you post.